List of wom Div 3 Scranton List of Team Values for Women D3 




 Scranton              2 - 4


 
Conf = Landmark                       ------ State =      
Mascot =                      ------ Coach = escavage                


 
GAME LIST 


 
 Team Power Rating =   89.8187561    
 home-field advantage =      -0.61

 Date  Opponent               Conf/State      (W-L, PR)      Score  
                                                          
 214 H Messiah                MAC Commonwea ( 4- 3, 89.0)     8-10   
 226 A York                   MAC Commonwea ( 3- 1, 96.1)     4-13   
 301 A Haverford              Centennial    ( 6- 1, 91.4)    13-14   
 305 A TCNJ                   NJAC          ( 4- 0, 93.4)    10-15   
 309 H Ithaca                 Liberty Leagu ( 3- 1, 92.2)    12-10   
 312 H Lebanon Valley         MAC Freedom   ( 3- 2, 81.9)    17- 7   
 315 A Stevens                MAC Freedom   ( 3- 2, 92.2)   
 323 A Juniata                Landmark      ( 2- 3, 81.1)   
 326 H Rowan                  NJAC          ( 5- 0, 97.5)   
 329 A Goucher                Landmark      ( 3- 3, 74.7)   
 402 H Lycoming               Landmark      ( 3- 2, 78.7)   
 405 H Catholic               Landmark      ( 1- 4, 88.5)   
 409 A Drew                   Landmark      ( 1- 5, 75.1)   
 412 A Elizabethtown          Landmark      ( 4- 1, 71.8)   
 416 A Wilkes                 Landmark      ( 0- 3, 58.6)   
 423 H Susquehanna            Landmark      ( 2- 4, 78.7)   
 426 H Moravian               Landmark      ( 2- 3, 80.4)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   214 H Messiah                 8-10      -2     1    -     -3.40
   226 A York                    4-13      -9    -6          -0.11
   301 A Haverford              13-14      -1    -2           1.18
   305 A TCNJ                   10-15      -5    -4          -0.80
   309 H Ithaca                 12-10       2    -1    +      3.79
   312 H Lebanon Valley         17- 7      10     8           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   214 H Messiah                 8-10      -2     1    -     -3.40

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   309 H Ithaca                 12-10       2    -1    +      3.79




 RATING BASED ON POWER RATING

 Power Rating............. 89.82 Power Rank.................    22
 SOS (PR) Rating.......... 78.65 SOS (PR) Rank..............     4
 SOS (RPI) Rating......... .7109 SOS (RPI) Rank.............     9
 RPI Rating............... .6165 RPI Rank...................    47
 Champ. Probability ......   0.0 Championship Rank .........   224
 Selection sum ...........   276 Selection Rank ............    72
 Qual Win (PR) Rating.....  -35. Qual Win (PR) Rank.........   143
 Qual Win (RPI) Rating....  -70. Qual Win (RPI) Rank........   220
    
 PERFORMANCE BASED ON POWER RATING

 Ave Offensive Goals .....  10.7 Ave Defensive Goals .......   11.5
 Wins/Losses(all   )......  2- 4 Ave Goal diff (all   ).....   -0.8
 Wins/Losses(top  5)......  0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top  5).....      
 Wins/Losses(top 10)......  0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 10).....      
 Wins/Losses(2nd 10)......  0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 20).....      
 Wins/Losses(last 3)......  2- 1 Ave Goal diff (last 3).....    2.3